After 900 days of reading, discussing and probing this unbelievably bizarre case of a once thought murdered toddler to now drowning victim, beautiful baby girl Caylee Marie, I’m making a solemn effort to accept and relish in the much awaited verdict, NOT GUILTY.  Within the first week of trial, I was convinced the State of Florida’s case against Casey Anthony could never be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in an American courtroom.  As I hoped and prayed, Casey Anthony was indeed acquitted of all charges pertaining to Caylee’s death along with indictments of felony child abuse and neglect. For all intents and purposes this case is “Closed”

As I am slowing backing away, feeling pangs of withdrawal to my addiction to the Casey Anthony saga, AGAIN I am utterly amazed and concerned with the aftermath we are witnessing.  Understandingly, as Casey Anthony’s freedom nears with so many left feeling hopeless in their quest to see her sentenced to death, they’ve hit thePetitionSiteDotCom.  There’s no better place to vent their anger than the “freebie” petition site Care2 dotCom.  I counted 32 separate petitions pertaining to Casey Anthony as of yesterday.

Here’s the most popular one:  

Petition For The Federal Government to Prosecute Casey Anthony = 8,066 signatures

In light of the travesty of justice perpetrated on the American people on July 5, 2011, by and through a verdict of acquittal on murder charges against Casey Marie Anthony in the Florida courtroom, we the undersigned hereby request and petition United States Attorney for the Central District of Florida, Robert O’Neill, and U.S. Attorney general, Eric Holder, to bring forth Federal charges against Ms Anthony for various civil rights violations committed against her deceased daughter, Caylee Anthony. We further believe that a federal prosecution against Ms Anthony would serve legitimate interests central to the American system of justice, which was impeded and undermined with respect to the verdict of acquittal rendered by the jury in that case.

“Obviously, the term “double jeopardy” means nothing to 8066 people. I suspect this is a knee jerk reaction to the verdict”

As supported by the 5th Amendment

The Fifth Amendment (Amendment V) to the United States Constitution, which is part of the Bill of Rights, protects against abuse of government authority in a legal procedure. Its guarantees stem from English common law which traces back to the Magna Carta in 1215. For instance, grand juries and the phrase “due process” both trace their origin to the Magna Carta.

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.[1]

Taxpayers vs. Casey
Anthony
= 25 signatures

Target 5000

 Target: Prevent the state from spending any more taxpayer dollars on/for Casey Anthony.

Are you wondering why Florida would spend our tax dollars to protect a person who for the last three years has:

  • Lied to everyone involved in trying to find her daughter
  • Manipulated our police officers
  • Accused (thru her attorney) our police for not conducting a thorough investigation
  • Incriminated innocent people (i.e., Zanaida)

NOW, she is FREE of murder and the state WANTS TO USE MORE OF OUR TAX DOLLARS TO PROTECT HER.
SAY NO AND STOP THE INJUSTICE!

There’s an oxymoronic petition.  The petitioner doesn’t want to waste anymore tax-payer money to protect Casey Anthony.  I suggest people should stop threatening her life and the lives of her attorneys so there will be no need to protect her.  That’s the quick fix.  Talk to your people!

 

Here’s one  STOP CASEY ANTHONY AND JOSE BAEZ FROM PROFITING

Target: WILLIAM MORRIS AGENCY

LET US BE CAYLEE’S VOICE AND STOP THE WILLIAM MORRIS AGENCY AND ANY OTHER AGENCY’S FROM PROFITING FROM CAYLEE’S DEATH. STOP CASEY ANTHONY AND JOSE BAEZ’S BOOK OR MOVIE DEAL WITH THE WILLIAM MORRIS AGENCY.

This petitioner doesn’t want Jose Baez to earn any money either.  Maybe they should ask Linda Drane Burdick and Jeff Ashton to hand over to charity any future monetary gains having to do with the death of Caylee Marie Anthony.  Not to mention the Talking Heads along with their networks, HLN, TruTV, Fox News, WFTV, WESH, etc, etc, etc. should hand over to charity any financial gain they  incurred while reporting the story of Caylee Marie Anthony. And if all else fails, ask the Gods That Be to toss them and their families onto the street and may they never be employed again.

Casey Anthony, the falsely accused mother of a dead child should never be given a chance to earn a dime along with Jose Baez, her attorney is preposterous!

 I propose a new petition. 

The Petition to End All the Petitions

 

TheJBMission~

  

Sources:

http://www.care2.com/find/site#q=Casey%20Anthony

The Constitution of the United States Amendment VI
In alll criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and
district whereins the crime shall have been committed; which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

Addendum:
Fortunately for Casey Anthony, Judge Belvin Perry did not grant defense attorney Cheney Mason any of his motions for a mistrial.

Mistrials are generally not by the double jeopardy clause. If a judge dismisses the case or concludes the trial without deciding the facts in the defendant’s favor (for example, by dismissing the case on procedural grounds), the case is a mistrial and may normally be retried. Furthermore, if a jury cannot reach a verdict, the judge may declare a mistrial and order a retrial as was addressed in United States v. Josef Perez, 22 U.S. 579 (1824). When the defendant moves for a mistrial, there is no bar to retrial, even if the prosecutor or judge caused the error that forms the basis of the motion. An exception exists, however, where the prosecutor or judge has acted in bad faith. In Oregon v. Kennedy, 456 U.S. 667 (1982), the Supreme Court held that “only where the governmental conduct in question is intended to ‘goad’ the defendant into moving for a mistrial may a defendant raise the bar of double jeopardy to a second trial after having succeeded in aborting the first on his own motion.”

Advertisements