I’m calling Bull**** on the media.
Does this document support the media allegation regarding Laura Buchanan’s tampering?
Is it on page 2 of 17, doc page 23471 of this link:

I noticed 2 dates, Sept 2nd and Sept 3rd. Did someone, possibly Laura Buchanan scribble 2 different dates on one sheet titled “Field Team Activity” because she wasn’t sure of the correct date?
Was this the sheet she should have turned in to Equusearch but didn’t? Or is Buchanan’s ominous crime revealed in another deposition from November 17th? I still haven’t found this document.

Is this what WESH used to base their claim “Volunteer Says She Took Form, Changed it?” From what factual document is WESH basing this allegation of tampering? In my quest to find the said document, I found the following WFTV article titled “New Ethics Complaint Could Cost Casey’s Lawyer”


Conway told Orange County sheriff’s investigators four months ago that Baez lied to Chief Judge Belvin Perry about how Conway had seen evidence showing Caylee’s body was not in the woods four months before her remains were found, but Conway told them, “I certainly did not see that, wasn’t aware of it.”
Conway said, at the time, he was thinking, “Bull****, it didn’t happen.”
The controversy swirls around Laura Buchanan, who had searched for Caylee’s body with the volunteer group EquuSearch. Conway said Baez kept pressing him to get EquuSearch documents from Buchanan, which Baez said proved Caylee’s body was not there in late summer, and Conway kept refusing.
Buchanan is under investigation for falsifying documents; she admitted to adding notes to EquuSearch documents she had taken home with her. During the time Baez pressed Conway to get the so-called important documents from Buchanan, Baez and Buchanan were in email communication.
The Florida Bar Association won’t say who filed the grievance or when, yet, but Sheaffer says you might now see Judge Perry ordering Baez to document any material claims he makes in court.

I’m thinking the same of Brad Conway….Bull****!! How does anyone know WHAT Jose Baez and Brad Conway talked about while in the cross hairs of Equusearch attorney Mark Nejame and Jose Baez’s fight for searcher documents! It sounds to me this is his word against Baez’s. No big deal.

Snipped from above article:

Buchanan is under investigation for falsifying documents; she admitted to adding notes to EquuSearch documents she had taken home with her.

Incidentally from the wording of the above snipplet, I’m beginning to believe this is the portentous tampered document which WESH considers tampering. Without ever having met Laura Buchanan, I could think of ten different reasons she would scribble a date on this sheet of paper. Perhaps if she’s on the phone with Baez or Kasper Jordan and she’s trying to answer questions and grasp some sort of recollection of the details from her searches as to which day did she search Suburban and which day she searched J. Blanchard Park, she may have been trying to remember the dates by remembering who was with her. There are a slew of reasons why she would write a date. As for her not returning the sheet to Equusearch, my question; whose responsibility was it to collect this Field Team Activity sheet? It didn’t become important to Equuasearch until Laura Buchanan became a possible witness for Casey Anthony’s defense. Then it was of major importance to EVERYBODY. It’s too obvious not to realize that Laura Buchanan’s testimony could cause considerable damage to the State’s theory and very likely useful for the defense.

Responding to the news story of yesterday “New Ethics Complaint Could Cost Casey’s Lawyer.” Legal analyst Bill Sheaffer calls Baez’s offense a possible ten, highest on a scale, on just how immoral Baez’s alleged conduct was.

Watch WFTV Bill Sheaffer video titled “Analysis Grievance Filed Against Baez”

And the timing couldn’t be any better. This little news tidbit follows a WESH report.
“Casey Defense Witness Admits She Altered Doc”
“Volunteer Says She Took Form, Changed it”


Yes, I see a definite pattern here. Anytime there’s a hint of supportive evidence or witness in Casey Anthony’s defense the media reaping in the ratings from this case automatically goes into panic mode and slams the internet with edgy misquoted updates. Positive publicity for Casey doesn’t sell advertising.

P.I. accused of Witness Tampering

Here’s another tampering claim. Jeremy Lyons, defense private investigator accused of witness tampering.  http://www.wftv.com/news/25455422/detail.html

Brett Churchill and Brett Reilly, both prosecution witnesses in Casey Anthony’s murder case, feel Lyons was trying to get them to change their testimony.

Did one of these witnesses use a tape recorder like Joe Jordan to prove their allegations?  Yet WFTV thought this was newsworthy.  The obvious reason WFTV ran this article is because it paints the entire defense team as unsavory criminals.  I call Bull**** on WFTV!

Whatever P.I. Jeremy Lyons did to intimidate Churchill and Reilly it couldn’t compare to the entrapment game that was played on Laura Buchanan by the highly respectable OCSO with the help of Kasper Jordan.  LE calls it a “controlled phone call”, I call it entrapment which by the way did not result in what the detectives were hoping for.

I would bet thousands of dollars had Ms Buchanan called any of these news circuits to complain about the treatment she endured by LE and the State Attorney’s Office they wouldn’t touch her story with a ten foot pole.

Reminiscent of another malicious allegation from the Orlando news circuit; the horrific “heart sticker” story. Although Lorie Gottesman of the FBI noted in her report there were no fragments or residue from a heart sticker supposedly found on the duct tape, this story was never retracted. Coincidentally, defense attorneys Jose Baez and Cheney Mason have both been accused of possibly tainting the jury pool whenever they make claims of progress for Casey Anthony. However I find a vicious rumor such as the one alluding to a mother sending off her murdered daughter by slapping a heart sticker on top of the duct tape supposedly used to kill her much more prejudicial to this case.

Read the malicious article here.
“Heart Sticker Was Placed On Duct Tape On Caylee”

Casey Defense Wants Heart Sticker Thrown Out

View doc page 5583, in FBI report under questioned document examination, Lorie Gottesman clearly states Q62-Q64 Tape pieces were examined for presence of any stickers. No sticker fragments were observed.

Ironically on December 30, 2010, Linda Drane Burdick, Assistant State Attorney for Orange County filed this motion.

There’s 6 listed criteria’s in all that LDB hopes Judge Perry will rule on in her favor. I’m not aware of his ruling yet.
She asked that the Defense not talk or mention anything to the Media that may point to Casey Anthony’s innocence and she wants Jose Baez to refrain from referring to some people as liars.
Here’s two criteria’s that I found interesting considering the latest news.
Snipped from Motion:

4. Any testimony or argument that unidentified members of the Orange County Sheriff’s Office, Office of the State Attorney, or any other government agency “leaked” information to the media, or any third party.
shhh..it’s a secret

5. Any testimony or argument that members of the Orange County Sheriff’s Office arranged for the Defendant to be video recorded upon learning that her daughter’s remains were found.
Yes, it’s true but shhh..the jury can’t know about this either

But it’s okay for the jury to read all of this negative news coverage against Casey Anthony and her Defense team because it’s beneficial to the State.

My new mantra when it comes to the news coverage of this case, “Consider the source”