In midst of ennui as most are awaiting the Anthony trial some have the proclivity to incite rumors in hopes of a tad bit of excitement to fill the void. Unfortunately today’s 16 minute hearing provided little enthusiasm as Judge Perry forced Jose Baez’s hand to provide State prosecutor Jeff Ashton with a list of his expectations to his ruling in the matter of disclosure of forensic expert testimony.

Of the thirteen defense experts, he ordered Baez & Co. to comply by sending Ashton written statements from each expert stating their qualifications, field of expertise, specific subject matter, substance of facts and a summary & grounds for their opinion. In totality the hearing was mundane at best.

In search of noteworthy information I came across a staggering rumor in blogdom concerning DNA results and an impending scandalous shocker. While attempting to get to the crux of the rumor I came across a blog authored by Seamus

The heading of his site reads;

Statement Analysis – Statement Analysis of famous cases including Casey Anthony, Misty Croslin, OJ, Michael Jackson, Tiger Woods, and others. All parties are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. All opinions expressed here are personal opinions and represent only the author of these opinions and not any business, government agency, or individual person other than the author.

To his credit, he admits his site is based on opinion which says to me “for entertainment purposes only” as I’m sure most will agree. If not for the fact that he’s made quite a derogatory accusation in which he could be held liable if Jose Baez sought  retribution I would say it’s comical.  Although I must admit, I do find the mention of Jesse Grund somewhat intriguing.

DNA Rumor

December 8, 2010


Wednesday, December 08, 2010

Casey Anthony Defense DNA Scandal Shocker?

Authored by

In what appears to be the worst possible attempt on the part of the Casey Anthony “dream turned nightmare team” to falsely accuse yet another innocent person, an uncomfirmed report says that a scandal may be emerging, that if true, will have long term ramifications for the defense.

There is no confirmation yet from WFTV, WESH, or other news agencies. Internet rumor?

We will update.

In an uncomfirmed report, it may be that someone on the defense team or within the family, perhaps private investigator, Dominic Casey, (or Lee Anthony?) under the direction of Jose Baez and/or Cindy Anthony, sought to plant DNA evidence from Jesse Grund, on to the body of Caylee Anthony, while her remains were yet to be found.

The report says that either Baez, or the family, sent the private investigator to to the place where Casey dumped Caylee in order to taint the body with some collected DNA evidence from Jesse Grund, former fiance of Casey Anthony.

This tells us that not only did they know where the body was (Statement Analysis previously concluded that Cindy Anthony knew where the body was the day she kicked Tim Miller out of her home), but that their planning was, perhaps, the reason why Lee Anthony refused to be polygraphed and urged his family to do the same.

Question: Are there any linguistic indicators to suggest that this report may be true?

Answer: See Cindy Anthony’s statement on The Today Show:

Cindy Anthony mentioned FAMILY and DNA at crime scene:

Is this credible?

Cindy Anthony from The Today Show:

“They must by saying that Casey must have been so calculated that she was able to put Caylee’s remains down there without any any any link to her. There’s no fibers, there’s no hair, there’s no DNA there’s no fingerprints of Caseys or anyone in our family. ”

Why did “family” and “DNA” enter into Cindy Anthony’s vocabulary while talking about the location of Caylee’s remains?

In light of the latest report, the inclusion of DNA on Caylee’s remains is haunting.

Note also that within this statement by Cindy is amazing details of what likely is exactly what Casey did. It shows an acute awareness of fibers, hair and DNA. Recall that Cindy Anthony boasted that she gave the FBI the wrong hairbrush, deliberately, in order to throw them off Casey’s trail. Our words reveal us; Cindy is no exception.

What if the report is true?

If the report turns out to be true, we can expect to see blame everywhere: beginning with Dominic Casey blaming Cindy Anthony or Jose Baez, and should move on to Baez blaming others. Eventually, investigators will speak to Casey Anthony, herself.

Who would Casey choose?

Casey Anthony’s hatred of Cindy Anthony is part of the comlex motive of the murder, but what has become of her relationship with Jose Baez?

When Baez was on Geraldo, he was asked if he had an “inappropriate relationship” with Casey Anthony.

He refused to answer the question.

Regardless of who she might choose, prosecutors will not likely believe her and will have to verify anything and everything Casey Anthony says.

Many have long felt that Cindy Anthony would face justice, one day, in her part of covering up, lying, and destroying evidence in attempts to save her daughter. These attempts include testifying under oath that Caylee is alive (and living in Brooklyn, NY) and that Jesse Grund was the killer. Richard Grund, Jesse’s father, has struggled to maintain his composure in light of false accusations against his son. should have more information as it breaks, and we will continue to cover the analysis of any statements.

Posted by Seamus O Riley at 12:55 PM